Forest thin­ning is caring

Growth and well­being for years to come

Forests need thin­ning to feel well. Thin­ning secu­res pro­per growth, value growth and health of the forest. Ponsse specia­li­ses in the cut-to-length forest mac­hi­nes, in which stems are already cut for dif­fe­rent pur­po­ses in the forest. The met­hod plays an impor­tant part in res­pon­sible fore­stry.  

Trees and roots need to com­pete over nut­rients in an unt­hin­ned forest, which is also suscep­tible to snow, wind and other dama­ges.  

“Thin­ning is inten­ded to pro­tect the well­being and growth of forests, as well as secure the supply of raw mate­rial. Thin­nings are neces­sary when the aim is to take good care of forests,” says Tuomo Moi­la­nen, Ponsse’s fore­stry specia­list and area direc­tor of Ger­many and Austria. 

During thin­ning, trees with a low poten­tial are remo­ved: dama­ged, bro­ken and low-qua­lity trees. High-qua­lity trees with the best abi­lity to grow are left stan­ding.  

Success­ful thin­ning is affec­ted by pre-clea­ring and stand ten­ding. When it is time for thin­ning, the cut-to-length forest machine’s sig­ni­ficance in avoi­ding damage to remai­ning trees and the ground are key.  

A pro­perly ten­ded forest pro­duces yields from one decade to the next 

At the begin­ning of the 19th cen­tury, selec­tion cut­ting was the pri­mary trend in Fin­land, which is the exact oppo­site of thin­ning, in that the best trees are selec­ted and fel­led.  

“When the best trees are always selec­ted for har­ves­ting, the worst trees remain to give birth to the next gene­ra­tion, reducing the qua­lity of the forest,” Moi­la­nen says.  

In res­pon­sible sil­vicul­ture, forest pro­duc­ti­vity remains high, decade after decade. Tho­rough­ness and bio­di­ver­sity are emp­ha­si­sed in har­ves­ting. Unneces­sary damage to the forest is to be avoi­ded and valuable assets, such as decayed wood, are to be taken into account.

“Valuable habi­tats are left untouc­hed. No trees are remo­ved, and they are not acces­sed by the forest mac­hine. Res­pon­sible thin­ning is car­ried out during the appropriate time of the year depen­ding on the forest and soil. Thin­ning done during the wrong time of the year causes unneces­sary dama­ges to the forest,” Moi­la­nen adds. 

In a pro­perly ten­ded forest, thin­ning is easier. Pre-clea­ring also makes the operator’s work easier and impro­ves the qua­lity of work: visi­bi­lity is bet­ter after part of the undergrowth has been remo­ved from around trees before thin­ning.   

The CTL met­hod plays a key part in res­pon­sible sil­vicul­ture

Ponsse specia­li­ses in the cut-to-length met­hod, in which stems are already cut for dif­fe­rent pur­po­ses in the forest, such as sawn or pulp logs. The met­hod plays an impor­tant part in res­pon­sible sil­vicul­ture.  

 “One of the lar­gest advan­ta­ges of the CTL met­hod is that the ground can be pro­tec­ted during fel­ling by lea­ving twigs and tree­tops on the trail. Both the har­ves­ter and forwar­der will then drive on a pro­tec­ted trail, placing less strain on the ground,” says Moi­la­nen. 


In the CTL met­hod, forwar­ders carry loads from forests, wit­hout drag­ging any trees against the ground. Ins­tead, in the tree-length met­hod, whole trees, inclu­ding branc­hes and tops, are brought to the road­side. Thin­ning with the cut-to-length met­hod enables the valuable raw mate­rial to be col­lec­ted unda­ma­ged.

“In the tree-length met­hod, it is chal­len­ging to main­tain a high level of qua­lity. When long stems are fel­led in the forest during first thin­ning, it will be dif­ficult to carry them away wit­hout causing damage,” Moi­la­nen says. 

The right mac­hine for the right job

In thin­ning the 20-metre gap between trails should be main­tai­ned. Unneces­sary detours in the forest create more trails, which should be as straight as pos­sible. Sta­bi­lity is requi­red from the mac­hine, and the ope­ra­tor needs to have excel­lent visi­bi­lity over the entire work area, so that trees can be thin­ned effec­ti­vely wit­hout dama­ging any other trees.  

During first thin­ning, in par­ticu­lar, forests are often dense, and the ave­rage stem size is small. To reach a suf­ficient level of pro­duc­ti­vity, small stems need to be proces­sed accu­ra­tely and quickly. The machine’s crane geo­metry and cont­rol sys­tem must sup­port effec­tive and precise ope­ra­tions.  

“During their shift, the ope­ra­tor proces­ses hundreds or even over a thousand stems. Wor­king must be easy so as not to tire the ope­ra­tor. Here, ergo­no­mics play an impor­tant part,” says Moi­la­nen. 

Trees remo­ved during thin­ning may also be dama­ged or unwan­ted. Unwan­ted trees may have been left in the area as seed­lings, or they may be much lar­ger than other trees. 

“When thin­ning from above, large trees must also be remo­ved. This sets requi­re­ment for the har­ves­ter head’s size and the crane’s power. Thin­ning from above can­not be done with small fore­stry mac­hi­nes,” Moi­la­nen says. 

Ponsse’s forest mac­hi­nes have wide tracks, inc­rea­sing the sur­face area towards the ground and reducing the sur­face pres­sure. The pres­sure direc­ted at the ground must be suf­ficiently low so that the forest mac­hine does not damage remai­ning tree roots and the ground unneces­sa­rily. 

More on our web­site CTL is res­pon­sible fore­stry